top of page
  • Writer's pictureMeggi

Holy Bitch's Wishes to Maria Romanova

Updated: Jul 31, 2023




False Empress Maria I

(to citizen Romanova M.V.)



ACTUAL AND LEGAL ACTIONS REQUIREMENT



Dear sister!



I am not invited to your birthday, so I convey my warmest sincere congratulations in writing.


Over the past few years, I have been observing with incredible amazement the appearance of a great-niece named Maria Vladimirovna Romanova from my great-grandfather Prince Mukhransky Ivan (Vano) Konstantinovich Bagration (a direct ancestor in the 6th generation from my father), who is the elder brother of Prince Irakli Konstantinovich Bagration, why -something now called Bagration-Mukhransky. No call from you, no letter, no birthday chocolates for family members. You are immediately in the kings - in the titles of empresses. The appearance (birth) of Maria Vladimirovna for the media and the general public, by an incredible coincidence, occurred after the death of both parents declared by Maria Vladimirovna.


Maria Vladimirovna Romanova over this long period did not find time to get acquainted with all the relatives of her mother Leonida Georgievna and get acquainted with her origin, the rules for inheriting titles, and with other nuances fundamental for participating in the process of inheriting the titles of ruling dynasties.


Otherwise, Maria Vladimirovna, if she really was related to the house of the Romanovs and Bagrations, firstly, she would have met all the relatives personally. Secondly, I would know where the prefix Mukhransky comes from. Thirdly, she would have known that she was not the heir to the titles of the Romanov dynasty. And that the Romanovs do not have the right to inherit the titles of rulers in Russia in principle. Fourthly, she would know that she has no right to use either the titles of the Romanovs or Bagrations, or the titles of rulers in relation to either Russia or the previously existing state of the Russian Empire.


However, for several years now, after proclaiming herself "Empress of All Rus' de jure", Maria Vladimirovna has been in no hurry to meet with her family and get acquainted with all the heirs, as well as with the table of ranks. This raises great doubts about the origin of Maria Vladimirovna and the presence of her kinship in principle with the dynasties, the descendant of which Maria Vladimirovna appears to be.


I admit the thought that perhaps some things are simply invisible to you because no one has told you about them before. I am very embarrassed that I have to send you this document, however, since you are affecting the honor and reputation of our family with your behavior, I cannot wait until someone else has the courage to tell you this. I'm just ashamed of how you fool the public and disgrace our family, because 99% of the population of the inhabitants do not understand what is at stake and are not able to appreciate your theatrical performance, which is akin to station thimble-makers.


De jure (from Latin de jure is written without a hyphen) means literally by virtue of the law. Even if we assume that you really are related to us, then you do not have any de jure rights to claim either the titles of rulers in relation to Russia or the Russian Empire, or the titles received as a result of dynastic marriages by dynasties for a variety of reasons. Since "according to the law" is written with an error both on your Wikipedia page ("de-jure"), and on your "aka mother" Leonida Georgievna, and on your other relatives, as well as on your website, the conclusion is quite straightforward - Wikipedia with your profiles are typesetted and written for you by the same person who typesets your site. In an incomprehensible way, the same literate person writes other articles on Wikipedia. Wikipedia belongs to the Hearst Corporation, and I find it difficult to even imagine on the basis of what the "Romanovs" and the Hearsts suddenly had feelings of such deep warmth for each other, because Hearst corporation typeset both articles about you on Wikipedia and your website.


Wikipedia does not allow you to write articles about yourself. But such persistent replication of the same spelling and lexical errors in Wikipedia correlates well after that with the replication of errors in the titles and spellings of the names of your "ancestors". Obviously, it doesn’t matter to you that Mukhrani, that Prince Mukhransky Bagration, that Bagration-Mukhransky. In addition to replicating spelling, lexical, and legal errors, your profile contains another fundamental error that any person from the dynasty will immediately notice, but will never be noticed by a foreigner or person not related to the family.


Your de facto, dear Maria Vladimirovna, correlates well with the image of the Empress as seen through the eyes of an average American - a fat yellow-toothed woman in gold and pearls, in an immense hoodie, against the backdrop of an interior with marble and gold, and ideally complements the image of an ordinary Russian person with the same American eyes - a balalaika, Putin, a nuclear reactor instead of a stove, a domestic security bear, a TV with propaganda, and vodka for breakfast. The average American does not know that in general in the dynasties with which you claim to be related, such design solutions are not in use, and that the houses and interfaces of gypsy barons, their chubby wives, are decorated so expensively and richly. At worst - theatrical costumes of the crazy Empress Irina Allegrova, the star of vocal arts Nadezhda Babkina, and Alla Borisovna's universal hoodies for any diet size.


I will not delve further into the piquant subtleties of the succession of the titles of the "Imperial House of Romanov" through the marriages of the younger lines of the "Bagration-Mukhranskys" with claims to world domination and the restoration of the monarchy in Russia. It makes no sense to discuss the claims to the throne of someone from the "dynasty" of Gongozllerns, since this is, in principle, not a dynasty. The issue of your claims to wear any titles is resolved in two simple planes. As you like - both de jure and de facto.


1. First of all, in order to inherit something according to the law, as you deign to mention de jure, it is necessary that the de jure inheritor receives this something. De jure, the Romanov dynasty in the form in which it, in your swarthy (immediately visible - clearly Saxon-Georgian) face, claims to rule Russia, modestly calling it "restoration of the monarchy", never received titles and the rights associated with them. It is not even worth talking about such trifles as property, as an addition to titles and associated rights. If you accidentally, by mistake, or through a misunderstanding, suddenly de facto accidentally took other people's things to which you de jure have no right (whether it be a title, or jewelry, or some kind of real estate, or bank accounts, and so further - the families were rich, there was a lot of property), then these other people's things should simply be promptly de facto returned to where you got them from, so that the legitimate heirs will already figure out how to deal with titles, and with the volume of associated rights, and with hereditary property. I understand that the text is complex, so I will be brief, especially for Roma. You need to go to the end of the queue after the Rurikovich-Gediminovich dynasty, and take a place in it only if you have a relationship with these dynasties. No emperors from the Romanov dynasty were ever allowed de jure to power in the Russian Empire, Russia, Rus', Kievan Rus, the Moscow Principality, and so on. And your son whom you claim to be the offspring of Kaiser Wilhelm II (although your glorious butuz looks like him like a mouse to a hippopotamus) can go for a walk until the second coming, while the adult heirs decide how much Germany owes Russia from old dynastic marriages. Your dynasty did not exist then, the noble ancestors of Fedor Koshka and Andrey Kobyla did not draw. This story is not your topic, and you were not here.

2. It is clear that during the period of the revolution and after it, many documents and archives were lost, and many members of our dynasties were shot without trial, and that there are other subtleties of establishing origin, kinship, and entry into the right of inheritance. However, I am sure that it does not make sense to dive into the subtleties regarding you and your ambitions, since your large, swarthy de facto in the 4th stage of obesity after plastic surgery and with smuggled Titanic-dyed hair does not correlate with the phenotypes of people that you call de jure and de facto by their closest relatives. You may not be very much like your mother or father, but if you consider yourself a member of centuries-old dynasties of rulers, you should have inherited at least traces of dominant genes, which in these dynasties are passed on unchanged from generation to generation. Some features may differ slightly, but for a brown bear to grow out of a hamster, dear Maria Vladimirovna, this has never happened before. Rurikovich from generation to generation are cloned like Dolly the sheep, both girls and boys. The Romanovs also have many common features that cannot be confused with anything (more precisely, the Anglo-Saxons, who in Russia took the surname Romanovs), Bagrations have obvious expressive common features of appearance. Not to mention the features of behavior that are also transmitted at the genetic level. Surely, we had epic fuck ups as well. By an interesting coincidence of events, confirming, as you like to express yourself de jure, the laws of biochemistry, genetics, common sense and logic. Similar cases have already taken place in the dynasty, when a brown bear grew out of a hamster due to adultery, or substitution in the maternity hospital for a gypsy child. No, you don’t think, we treat all nationalities well - both bears, and gypsies, and Moldovans, and other people of the ethnic group of the Balkan Peninsula (it is they who will give birth to large women with a rich physique and dark skin, chubby short handles, on which pearls look very funny). In gypsies, the structure of the nose and the proportions of the face are very similar to yours, when the lower third is much larger than the middle and upper. If you insist on being related to the Bagrations and Romanovs, then I dare to assure you that your stunning forehead is in this case a brutal mutation, since no one has observed this in any of the members of the pedigree up to the 63rd generation. I don't know what dose of radiation one had to receive in order to get such an outstanding charming forehead like yours, which does not at all resemble any of your relatives, but even your parents. You may not have thought, but among the Georgians and Germans with whom you claim to be related, there are women of a completely different physique and appearance, and the fact that none of them did plastic surgery is a matter of course. Have you never looked in the mirror? Aren't you yourself alarmed by the fact that you are not like any of your relatives, kinship with whom you call the basis of inheritance of titles and related rights? I dare to believe that you are not of our breed is obvious even to a deaf-blind-mute person who currently attends an inclusive church in the Simonov Monastery. Where are you with your claims to be a member of the dynasty, did not even roll.


I cannot but note at the end of my congratulatory letter that the external configuration of the exterior of your "Tsesarevich" is not at all of our breed, nor does it bear any resemblance to persons with whom you have de jure claims to be related. Your boy is a nice curly, but not ours. I mean, not from the Bagrations, not from the Romanovs, and even more so not from the descendants of Kaiser Wilhelm II, and in general, to be honest, I have never come across such specimens when compiling a family tree of people with whom you can at least theoretically be related based on from the posts you make. Biology does not yet know such that two rabbits have a rhinoceros. At least in some generation, theoretically, rabbit ears, or at least a tail, should have been inherited. No one had recessive obesity genes in our mixed dynasties of alpha males and alpha females (where there were Anglo-Saxons, Scandinavian kings, Mongoloids, Polish gentry, Lithuanians, Russian boyars), and people with such dimensions, skulls, luxurious yellow teeth, and other features of development and appearance from a very specific ethnic group. I will simplify the presentation even more - we did not have gypsies in our family. Although they really stole horses, we did not enter into marriages with you.


You and your Tsesarevich can declare yourselves at least the Grand Inquisitors of the foreseeable universe. But this will not bring you one iota closer to the shape of the skull, hairline, shape of the nose, maxillofacial bones, and other anthropological features that we had great pleasure to observe invariably passed down from generation to generation on icons, portraits and photographs of the Bagrations, Rurikovichs, Gediminoviches, Chingizkhanovs, and finally the Hanover Welf dynasty, to which some of the "Romanovs" had a misunderstanding, and other quite well-known people in their circles. Abstracting from dynastic conflicts, the faces and phenotypes of representatives of dynasties left their mark on a large number of portraits, icons, photographs, daguerreotypes, and other masterpieces of fine art.


On none of them in 8 years of viewing the materials, I have not met anyone even remotely similar to you. I don't want to upset you, but your impressive swarthy de facto fits very well with the ethnic group and profile of the gypsy baron wives. But it does not correspond in any way to the Anglo-Saxon and Georgian profile of people who have the misfortune to be considered your ancestors, according to your statements.


This embarrassing situation arose because, apparently, the difference between the Anglo-Saxons, Lithuanians, Georgians, and your broad-shouldered Romanesque ethnic origin is imperceptible only to you, and the people around you are simply embarrassed to tell you about it, or cannot even dare to assume impudence of such magnitude. And also probably because the words "Romance", "Roma" and "Romanovs" are mistakenly considered to have the same root. If you claim the surname "Romanovs" from the word "Roma" (the name of the Gypsy ethnic group on the territory of the former USSR), then you guessed right with the surname, because it absolutely correctly reflects your real origin.


In the modern world of documents, tests, laboratory results are very easily falsified. The archives of the Russian Empire were burned and destroyed for a long time, the remains of the heirs of the ruling dynasties were defiled and destroyed, archival materials and documents of the registry office were also destroyed and modified. The appearance of the heir to the dynasty is his hallmark. Molecular and behavioral genetics, together with genealogical genetics, is the only way to judge the degree of relationship with relative certainty. No real heir will do plastic surgery and body modifications, since appearance is actually a genetic passport. Your wonderful reshaped nose does not mean that you are watching yourself, but that you are trying to remake your genetic passport. Since you are claiming titles at the same time, I dare to assume that the alterations are clearly not caused by your desire to hide your relationship with us. On the contrary - desperate attempts to comply. Dear Maria Vladimirovna! You can sew at least three noses on yourself. You will never change your skull, forehead, neck, conformation, and behavior. Therefore, if you are trying to remake your face in order to somehow be similar to the dynasties with which you declare kinship, you are not of our breed.


Contrary to all the laws of biology, molecular and behavioral genetics, you, Maria Vladimirovna, have not inherited anything from your declared descendants. In the dynasties to whose descendants you claim to be related, various methods of modifying appearance are not used. This is done for the simplest reasons - the similarity of phenotypes, and the inheritance of external characteristics is irrefutable evidence of kinship. Therefore, you are not a legitimate member of the Romanov (Imperial House) or Bagration families, since you are not even their biological relative.


This disgrace that you daily bring on our family by your existence and communication that you are a member of our family, and claiming inheritance property and rights, about which you spread your statements, must be immediately stopped.


In connection with the foregoing, I demand from you within 10 working days from the date of receipt of this application:

Officially distribute on your website a statement that you are not the heiress of the Bagration and Romanov dynasties, are not related to them, and do not have any rights to titles, and carry out the appropriate transformation of all your "dynastic" activity - remove any references to the dynasty Romanovs and Bagrationov, remove any references to your connection with any dynasties of the rulers of Russia and its predecessors (the Russian Empire).

Report reliable information about your real origin to where they have already got - to Wikipedia, and bring the profiles of persons whom you call your relatives and parents into line with the real state of affairs.

Return the hereditary property illegally obtained by you to its rightful owners.

Stop mentioning anywhere and ever in the future that you are a descendant of the Bagration dynasty (princes of Mukhransky) and the Russian imperial family.

At the end of my letter, with warm pioneering greetings to your "holy family" from the Vanguard corporation, I assure you that the offspring of Karl of Prussia, holder of the Iron Cross of the 3rd Reich, are not expected at the helm in Russia. The 100 million murdered by your closest relatives by marriage, including the enterprising brothers from the Sinaloa cartel and his colleagues, excludes any possibility of you or your handsome curly-haired burly man in any form in power in Russia de jure by virtue of the criminal law, if you know such.


After the Armenian genocide by your closest brothers, and the brutal murder by your relatives in the husband of Prince Alexander Iraklievich Bagration-Mukhransky in the Pyatigorsk massacre, to dare to call yourself a descendant of the Bagration dynasty (Armenian princely family, if anything) and claim after that some titles of our family is just cosmic shame. After the Red Terror, the Pyatigorsk massacre, the Holocaust and the Armenian genocide, a woman from the royal family of Bagratids could not create a marriage with a representative of the 3rd Reich. Your origin stories don't stand up to scrutiny.


Your place, dear "sister" Maria Vladimirovna, is in the toilet "busy!" scream with such a mind and such external data. Apparently, Steven Schwartzman advised you on the “loaf-baba” hairstyle, according to old memory, he dyed it along the way. Kill yourself once and for all on your short reshaped nose, or on a wide forehead. Our heirs here are not the broad-faced Batkivshchina, but the Scandinavian-Lithuanian-Mongolian-Slavic-Jewish-Anglo-Saxon thoroughbred matriarchy in full growth now and forever and forever and ever. Bullshit won't work. This is not for you in Miami fairy tales about balalaikas and bears on Red Square tell.


I hereby notify you that all correspondence on my behalf on inheritance issues, including the burial of my ancestors and relatives, inheritance cases, and representation of my interests in law enforcement agencies, the notary chamber, and courts on these issues, is authorized to be carried out by the organization OOO Management Company "BOOST" ( LLC UK "BOOST"), to which I transferred the inheritance property and all related rights under the management agreement. Correspondence sent on my behalf, or on behalf of LLC MC "BOOST" on these issues, has the same legal force.


When preparing answers, please refer to the registration number and date of the document. Documents sent electronically or which cannot be compared with the document to which they refer, are not subject to consideration and no response will be sent to them.


Anna Maria Serafima Irina Ingegerd Solomonia Elisabeth Sofia Emma Adelaide Bertha Githa Gizella Elena Olga Ryksa Evdokia Ekaterina Salomé Feofaniya Christina Estrid Itta Judith Aeda Oda Eowa Estrid Gizella Ludmila Gertrude Agnes Biagota Jutta Astrid Theodossia Emnilda Edla Efanda Kinetrita Osburga "Meggi" of Rørik Slyngebond, House of Skjöldungar of Russia, Kiev, Galicia, Volyn, England, Germany, Austria, Poland, France, Hungary, Italy, Czech, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Belgium, Switzerland, Montenegro, Serbia, Croatia, Romania, Finland, Hungary, Lithuania, Estonia, Latvia, Luxemburg. Dynasties of Ynglings - Saxony - Alsace - Lorraine - Mercian - House of Godwin - Skjoldungs - Stenkils - Salian - Munsö - Ottonian - Vukanovici - Znojmo - Udonens - Conradines - Udalrichings - Knutlings. Grand Duchess (Velikaya Knyaginya) of Moscow and all Russia, Grand Duchess (Velikaya Knyaginya) of Kiev and Chernigov, Grand Duchess (Velikaya Knyaginya) of Kiev von Hohenstaufen, Grand Duchess (Velikaya Knyaginya) of Lithuania, Grand Duchess (Velikaya Knyaginya) of Poland. Grand Princess of Serbia and Rascia. Duchess of Swabia. Pfalzgräfine von Lotharingen-Sachsen. Princess of Britain, Burgundy, Germany, Sweden, Italy, Denmark, Norway, France, Hungary, Macedonia, Sussex, Kent, Wessex, Croatia, Dalmazia, Czech, Jerusalem, Scotland, Finland, Schleswig, Pomerania. Princess of Sweden, Denmark, Courland, Saxony, Estonia, Gardariki, Northumberland England with the capital in Riga. Duchess of Berg, Bohemia, Carinthia, Sussex, Kent, Wessex, Saxony. Gräfine zu Lauffen-Bretten van Egisheim from Alsace. Duchess of Sussex, Kent, Wessex, East England. Margravine of Austria, Bavaria, Burgundy, Turin, Tuscany. Princess of England, Countess of Blois, Châteaudun, Chartres, Meaux, of Sancerre, Saint-Florentin, Provins, Montereau, Vertus, Oulchy-le-Château, Château-Thierry, Châtillon-sur-Marne and Montfelix.



🎞Follow Black Rabbit to discover the whole story:

1 view0 comments

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page