Who framed Black Rabbit?
February 6th, 2024
🎬As per Wikifakedia, the all family members did the impossible. In contradiction to the common sense, family traditions, behavioural genetics, and the external obstacles in the form of closed borders and military operations - all of them, hereditary monarchs, like peasants school kids, left their spouses with the children (consider that it was time of the war), and hit all serious things, entering, according to Wikifakedia, without the conclusion and dissolution of marriage into muddy sexual relations with people who do not correspond to their status. Moreover, these links to the level of everyday peasant ducking for some reason were inscribed in history and documented by Wikifakedia almost better than legal marriage unions. Drawing a line under the fate of the couples of Tolstoy/Filosofov, Bogarne/Koutchubei, according to Wikifakepedia, all these unions were broken in an impossible way, the spouses are separately listed as emigrants, and the fate of the children is unknown.
With a simple fact-check (we made inquiries to both the border control and the registry offices in the United States, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Austria, where four of these people allegedly "emigrated"), the facts of the immigration of these 4 people were confirmed in 0 out of 4 cases described in Wikifakedia.
The only verification of the kinda "immigration" of Ilya Tolstoy was the link to the newspaper with the announcement of his death, which cannot be considered as a credible source, because in the US, the toured there, according to Wikifakedia "the son of the great writer Leo Tolstoy, Count Ilya Tolstoy" possessed the absolutely different appearance from the true Iliya Tolstoy, as we noted in the previous publications. And the only proof of the personality of this fraudster, was the allocation of his photo in the other source of fakes - the Library of the US Congress. As the last important detail, on the photo from this library of the US Congress fakes, was depicted a man whose appearance precisely matched to the appearance of the Orekhkvskaya Gang's bandit, who was discovered as living in the apartments of the murdered grandson of Mikhail Iliyich Tolstoy, the true son of Iliya Tolstoy, with the fake passports, and the apartments connected to the legacy rights of the Tolstoy's dynasty were discovered as illegally rewritten for the benefit of the other people based on the falsified documents. This criminal case is now under the investigation of the Investigative Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation. These facts merged together caused a great desire among both legitimate heirs and law enforcement agencies to deeply immerse themselves in the study of the circumstances where and how four people of hereditary monarchs disappeared at the same time, and instead of them appeared four similar articles in Wikifakedia and a foreign photo of one of the bandits of the Orekhovskaya organized criminal group with the signature "Count Ilya Tolstoy in the United States after emigration," the source of which is the Library of the US Congress.
According to the photo and the actual circumstances, on the photo is Rysev A.V., as per Wikifakedia, who died and buried on the cemetery alley of Orekhovskaya Gang and, in reality, now is living with someone else's passport in the apartment of the real heir of Ilya Tolstoy and actually all these 4 listed as "divorced and emigrated."
Taking steps back to explain all concerns regarding the fake biographies, the second one arisen from the story of the impossible and improbable divorce according to the Wikifakedia. The family of Leo Tolstoy and Romanovs and their origin did not allow a divorce as an option. The dynastically based status of a hereditary monarch ultimately does not permit the divorce as a regular action, reserving this rare exception in the cases of the child birth difficulties. The only acceptable reason for the cancellation of the marriage of monarchs is the death of the spouse. Thus, the dissolved partnership and divorce of Iliya Tolstoy and Sofia Filosofova were equally impossible, and in terms of forensic linguistics metaphorically means the occurrence of the "divorce" - the death of the spouse.
Moreover, considering the death of their son in 1915 according to the Wikifakedia, the probability that Iliya Tolstoy left in Russia his wife with four kids just after the death of the son, and immediately divorced to marry the polish Satanist sectarian, seems impossible and improbable.
The complete interpretation going further in this series of the posts, with this one we concentrate our attention on the fixing of facts having the crucial meaning for the transcription of the metamessage. As per fake biography of Sofia Filosofova, the funny concept of her "immigration" through the territory of the Osman Empire to the final destination point in Chekhoslovakia to die here in 1934 seems the equally probable as the aforementioned movements of Iliya Tolstoy through the closed borders and the war theatre across continents and oceans. So long pathway to undertake just to die! The borders were closed, the divorce was impossible, and the route to escape Russia, even though occurred in reality as stated by the Wikifakedia, was transiting through the countries of mass genocide, mass serial ritual murders of Slavs and aristocracy, and well developed system of the death camps. In Chekhoslovakia, a country of the axis, the Teresienstadt death camp has been already opened. Thus, Russian noble Sofia Filosofova was unable not emigrate, she could be only departed to die. During the WWI, the methods to deliver the imprisoned for the further genocide in action were the same as applied later, during the WWII epoch. The research shows that the largest part of the genocide operational model had a basis on a deception, kidnapping and hostage-taking to deliver the victims to the death camps. The broad system of the death camps has already started to function, and people did not go there voluntarily. In terms of the number of "missing" - people who disappeared without a trace - WWI is not inferior to WWII, the murdered victims lost due to the complicated well organized death conveyer, data and document' falsification, the destroying of the crimes' traces including massive burning of corpses, obstruction of investigation and detection of crimes.
Both spouses Tolstoy and Filosofova had the great chance to be murdered and dissolute without any traces in this human heap leaching machine in case of their real immigration.
The further study of the biographies of Iliya Tolstoy and Sofia Filosofova, shows the two similarly impossible biographies, equally inconsistent versions of the dates, places, and circumstances of the death, marriage, childbirth, travelling. Both biographies were written using the very recognizable similar rhetoric, idea, explaining, metalanguage including terminology and metaphoric communication. Knowing the specifics of the fascism as a totalitarian religious sects, which has substituted the verbal communications by metaphoric visual-spatial language, the history of the death camps, metalanguage, the culture and rituals of the fascists, it is quite simple to transcribe the allegoric Wikifakedia articles into the form of the direct verbal message, and figure out who is the author of it.
🎞Follow:
Credits:
Olsson, J. (2018). Wordcrime: Solving Crime Through Forensic Linguistics. Bloomsbury Publishing Inc.
Kulikova, I., Salmina D. (2002). Introduction to metalinguistics: linguistic terminology in the communicative and pragmatic aspect. SAGA, Saint Petersburg.
Tiersma, P., & Solan, L. M. (2002). The Linguist on the Witness Stand: Forensic Linguistics in American Courts. Language, 78(2), 221–239. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3086556
Francis Nolan. (1991). Forensic Phonetics. Journal of Linguistics, 27(2), 483–493. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4176127
Tiersma, P. M. (1993). Linguistic Issues in the Law [Review of Language in the Judicial Process; The Language Scientist as Expert in the Legal Setting: Issues in Forensic Linguistics, by J. Levi, A. G. Walker, R. W. Rieber, & W. A. Stewart]. Language, 69(1), 113–137. https://doi.org/10.2307/416418
Hargitt, S. (2013). What Could Be Gained in Translation: Legal Language and Lawyer-Linguists in a Globalized World. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20(1), 425–447. https://doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.20.1.425
Marschark, M., Spencer, L. J., Durkin, A., Borgna, G., Convertino, C., Machmer, E., Kronenberger, W. G., & Trani, A. (2015). Understanding Language, Hearing Status, and Visual-Spatial Skills. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 20(4), 310–330. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26172500
TURBAYNE, C. M. (1971). VISUAL LANGUAGE. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 28(1), 51–58. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42574680
Humphrey, A. S., & CARVAJAL, J. (2015). VISUAL AND SPATIAL LANGUAGE: THE SILENT VOICE OF WOODSTOCK. Composition Studies, 43(1), 19–30. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43501876
Merrill, M. S. (2004). MASKS, METAPHOR AND TRANSFORMATION: THE COMMUNICATION OF BELIEF IN RITUAL PERFORMANCE. Journal of Ritual Studies, 18(1), 16–33. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44368668