Movie Making
The portfolio of assets we have collected contains both property and non-property rights, including those arising from the commission of serial grave and especially aggravated crimes against persons from whom we acquired such rights. We describe how we gathered them and combined them with a Nuremberg Trials case.
Toxic Claims
As an asset class, toxic assets represent assets that contain significant defects. These defects do not allow to realize the associated ownership rights, derive income, and get all the benefits from these assets if these defects do not exist. These defects appear due to the illegal activities of their beneficiaries, management, or third parties. Financial insolvency may result from these operational or legal defects. Property, property rights, intangible assets, financial securities, and other objects of property that have significant defects in ownership rights, various encumbrances, or disproportionate financial obligations are all types of toxic assets. BOOST buys toxic assets to enhance their worth by removing ownership flaws and restoring the business. The new assets' status after the clearance enables their further development. BOOST obtains legal, operational, and beneficiary control over assets that were previously lost by the legal beneficiary, restoring business activity, restoring the property status of the assets, relaunching business operations, and implementing a corporate turnaround to boost the assets' value. Here we outline the brief information about toxic assets under our control. We aim to do that due to their great significance and public outcry. However, at the moment, we reveal only general information for a common understanding of the subject matter. You shall not consider this information as an exhaustive, structured, detailed, and complete description. That is the delineation of the toxic assets, which may not include the entire list of defendants, the list of linked cases, the details of the proceedings, or other remarkable data needed to make any business decisions. To get the complete legal disclaimer, please, visit the appropriate section of our website. In the descriptions, we do not provide detailed references to the attributes of concrete documents due to the large volume of evidence. For the same reason, we do not itemize the names of people and the list of all criminal episodes. Even though we strive to disclose publicly such documents and their content in form allowed to make the correct conclusion for the third parties through examination of such materials, we publish the descriptions of the cases on this website to provide general awareness of the case substances. Keep in mind that the nature and volume of the materials require meaningful commentary. You shall not consider this information in isolation from the context and on a stand-alone basis. Subscribe to our newsletter if you want to receive regular updates.
The causal (or cause-in-fact) requirement is a condition of liability for result crimes such as homicide, mayhem, arson, property damage, and the like (Ferrante M., 2008).
The discovery of a chain of cause-effect relationships between a series of events, even if they seem unrelated, can confirm evidence of causation. The detailed attributes of events must be studied to complete this process. We explain the cause-effect relationships and tactics here, starting with the simplest cases, which ultimately led us to Hermann Goering, one of the main figures in Nazi Germany.
01
We Knew the Cases
Our initial focus was on consolidating claims we knew from within. Our selection of projects was limited to those where we had deep knowledge of the case substance. When we acquired it, we were unaware of the perpetrators and did not assume that we collected claims against the same organized group. It was found during the subsequent collection and investigation process.
02
Identification of Series
All cases we collected, shared common traits. We identified the list of visible offenders at the first level after starting the investigation. We have yet to discover that the individuals who sold us their claims were actually selling us the claims against themselves. We identified the crime series among cases on our balance by comparing the list of common traits and offenders and verifying that they were committed by an organized criminal group. Later, it was revealed that the individuals who sold us their claims were members of the same organized criminal group, and the nature of the cases is completely different. In reality, there was no raider business capturing. To erase the criminal legacy of these organizations, imitation of hostile takeovers of companies like Bananamama, Eldorado, Sunrise, and others was employed. The implementation of this initiative was aided by the use of a fake legend about the 'poor entrepreneurs', including Oleg Yakovlev, Sergey Bobylev, Sergey Magnitsky, Andrey Borodin, Evgeny Chichvarkin, and others. Fake legends were disseminated by the mass media and claimed that their businesses were lost due to a hostile takeover. However, nobody asked them what was the source of billions of dollars they invested in their legal entities. Understanding the entire story is essential at this point.
03
Movie Extension
Based on our commitments, we started the investigation. We have discovered that all the organizations we were able to claim back due to our rights, as well as the organizations involved in the crime, were a part of the same legal group. Thus, both the victim and the offender seemed to be the same subject. This group comprised organizations that were affiliated with the Los Zetas drug cartel. Bananamama, Eldorado, Sunrise, and others remained within the drug cartels' control of their business group after the hostile takeover. The 'poor entrepreneurs' in fact appeared to be bogus directors who were guided by the senior level of criminals within the same criminal group. The credits that were described as 'stolen' and 'misappropriated' in the accusation were never issued. As we found out later, when we initiated the criminal investigation to execute our commitments, the sellers of the claims attempted to stop the investigation to avoid revealing the real truth. The brightest example was Oleg Yakovlev and Oxana Bobyleva. When they were unsuccessful in their attempts, they devised a criminal plan to illegally acquire the BOOST in order to end the investigation and get back their claims against themselves. Alfa-Bank, Sberbank, VTB, Moscow Credit Bank, Investment Company A1, Russian Standard Bank, NP Bunkovo, and other criminal group members participated in this activity for the same reason.
04
Mens Rea
After it was discovered that in reality no raider takeovers took place, and the hype in the press was associated with actions designed to mislead a wide range of people about real events in the companies Bananama, Eldorado, Sunrise and others, BOOST sent a request to the Investigation Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation on the consolidation of criminal cases in accordance with Article 153 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation in relation to raider takeovers of the companies Bananama, Sunrise, Eldorado, Hermitage Capital, Euroset, Teploservis, Bank of Moscow, Investlesprom, and cases directly related to these cases regarding the deliberate bankruptcy of the Eldorado company, the murder of Sergei Magnitsky, and the plane crashes in Petrozavodsk in 2011 and at Vnukovo airport in 2014. The subsequent investigation revealed that, in fact, the companies whose owners sold their rights to BOOST allegedly in connection with the raider takeover (Yakovlev, Martynovs, Bobyleva, Andreev) were part of a scheme to introduce drug cartel money into legal economic circulation in Russia. The use of this money was extended to finance terrorist activity and implement aggressive war as part of the rebirth of the 3rd Reich in the United States and Germany following the official announcement of Nazi Germany's surrender in 1945.
05
Timeline Extension
During the investigation, BOOST fulfilled its obligations to manage the inherited property of its sole beneficiary, Meggi Göring (Raevskaya-Repnina). The investigation revealed that her parents and other testators were murdered, and the perpetrators were the same organized group of people. The aim of these crimes was to illegally take inherited property, one of which was the right to the Vanguard fund, which was established with money from the 3rd Reich accumulated during the 2nd World War. These facts made it possible to combine within the framework of criminal proceedings the inheritance case (Heritage project), the Hateful Eight project, which represents evidence of the continuation of military activities on Russian territory after the official announcement of the surrender of Nazi Germany, and cases of war crimes committed during the 2nd World War. On the main episode of the Nuremberg trials, the legal proceedings and investigation have not yet been completed, criminal cases for identified war crimes continue to be initiated, including by the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, and the statute of limitations and timeframe restrictions for bringing to criminal liability for these crimes have not been established. This enabled us not only to merge all these criminal cases in the legal proceedings as a series of crimes, but also to reinstate procedural deadlines. Thus, all illegal actions taken within the framework of 3 consolidated BOOST projects no longer have a statute of limitations and will be carried out until the full restoration of violated rights, the return of all lost assets, and the recovery of all damages caused in the amount of the full actual damage, taking into account the already received prejudice.
06
Discovery of Organization
After combining the episodes of the cases and identifying the series, it was discovered that all the members of the organized crime group who committed them are biologically related, or are part of unified organizations with a formalized hierarchy, or act as mercenaries within the framework of the US CIA ZR/RIFLE and MKULTRA programs. The opening of these programs happened just before the start of World War 2, and those same mercenaries were subsequently utilized, among other things, as members of the Nazi organization. This discovery had a major impact on the definition of a defendant in a World War II war crimes case. The Nuremberg trials study has revealed the ethnic and professional backgrounds of those involved in mass serial ritual murders that took place in the death camps during the World War II era. By examining these details, it was possible to describe the general organizational hierarchy of what history refers to as Nazi Germany or the Third Reich. This organization was actually formed by a group of individuals who brought together the Roman Catholic Church, Glencore group of companies, the Cosa Nostra mafia clan, and the US CIA.
07
Actus Reus
By identifying a group of individuals, it was possible to expand the timeline of a series of crimes and identify new episodes to be included in the general list committed by the same organized criminal group. Furthermore, it was feasible to define the motive for committing crimes and pinpoint the main type of criminal activity. The criminal group in charge committed mass ritual serial murders for selfish reasons. The group's objective was to acquire as much property as possible, primarily gold, due to the religious attitudes underlying their beliefs. The group aimed to acquire uncontrollable large authority of power, replace the public administration system in various countries, undermine the authority of the official government, social stability, and economic well-being, including through terrorism. Minor terrorists (child soldiers) were also employed to carry out terrorism. The key feature of the crimes committed was their ritual nature and the spatial-figurative method of communicating criminal messages.
08
Nüremberg Ring
The rights we gained through companies and inheritance cases extended beyond the scope of economic litigation. These projects are a reflection of complicated, large-scale criminal proceedings. The charges against the defendants include genocide, encroachment on a statesman's life, mass ritual serial homicide, terrorism, the use of prohibited chemical weapons, and aggressive war. All persons who sold BOOST their rights to companies that took part in this activity are now defendants in these cases. Among other things, they are charged with attempting to raid BOOST for the purpose of evading the fulfillment of their obligations under transactions concluded with BOOST, obstructing the investigation and detection of crimes committed, and complicity in repeated attempts on the life of the sole beneficiary, owner, and head of BOOST - Meggi Goering (Raevskaya-Repnina). All these episodes are combined with cases of war crimes committed, including during World War II, and there is no statute of limitations for them. Collection of damages for these episodes and criminal prosecution will continue to the end, regardless of the timing of the conclusion of agreements with BOOST and the dates of acquisition of rights to toxic assets by BOOST.
Have you questions? Ask us!
10, Vozdvizhenka
Moscow, 125009, Russia
Phone: +7 977 932 89 76
Mobile: +7 977 932 89 76